- Scheduling Across Applications
- Scheduling Within an Application
Spark has several facilities for scheduling resources between computations. First, recall that, as described in the cluster mode overview, each Spark application (instance of SparkContext) runs an independent set of executor processes. The cluster managers that Spark runs on provide facilities for scheduling across applications. Second, within each Spark application, multiple “jobs” (Spark actions) may be running concurrently if they were submitted by different threads. This is common if your application is serving requests over the network. Spark includes a fair scheduler to schedule resources within each SparkContext.
Scheduling Across Applications
When running on a cluster, each Spark application gets an independent set of executor JVMs that only run tasks and store data for that application. If multiple users need to share your cluster, there are different options to manage allocation, depending on the cluster manager.
The simplest option, available on all cluster managers, is static partitioning of resources. With this approach, each application is given a maximum amount of resources it can use and holds onto them for its whole duration. This is the approach used in Spark’s standalone and YARN modes, as well as the coarse-grained Mesos mode. Resource allocation can be configured as follows, based on the cluster type:
- Standalone mode: By default, applications submitted to the standalone mode cluster will run in
FIFO (first-in-first-out) order, and each application will try to use all available nodes. You can limit
the number of nodes an application uses by setting the
spark.cores.maxconfiguration property in it, or change the default for applications that don’t set this setting through
spark.deploy.defaultCores. Finally, in addition to controlling cores, each application’s
spark.executor.memorysetting controls its memory use.
- Mesos: To use static partitioning on Mesos, set the
spark.mesos.coarseconfiguration property to
true, and optionally set
spark.cores.maxto limit each application’s resource share as in the standalone mode. You should also set
spark.executor.memoryto control the executor memory.
- YARN: The
--num-executorsoption to the Spark YARN client controls how many executors it will allocate on the cluster (
spark.executor.instancesas configuration property), while
spark.executor.memoryconfiguration property) and
spark.executor.coresconfiguration property) control the resources per executor. For more information, see the YARN Spark Properties.
A second option available on Mesos is dynamic sharing of CPU cores. In this mode, each Spark application
still has a fixed and independent memory allocation (set by
spark.executor.memory), but when the
application is not running tasks on a machine, other applications may run tasks on those cores. This mode
is useful when you expect large numbers of not overly active applications, such as shell sessions from
separate users. However, it comes with a risk of less predictable latency, because it may take a while for
an application to gain back cores on one node when it has work to do. To use this mode, simply use a
mesos:// URL and set
spark.mesos.coarse to false.
Note that none of the modes currently provide memory sharing across applications. If you would like to share data this way, we recommend running a single server application that can serve multiple requests by querying the same RDDs.
Dynamic Resource Allocation
Spark provides a mechanism to dynamically adjust the resources your application occupies based on the workload. This means that your application may give resources back to the cluster if they are no longer used and request them again later when there is demand. This feature is particularly useful if multiple applications share resources in your Spark cluster.
Configuration and Setup
There are two ways for using this feature.
First, your application must set both
Second, your application must set both
after you set up an external shuffle service on each worker node in the same cluster.
The purpose of the shuffle tracking or the external shuffle service is to allow executors to be removed
without deleting shuffle files written by them (more detail described
below). While it is simple to enable shuffle tracking, the way to set up the external shuffle service varies across cluster managers:
In standalone mode, simply start your workers with
spark.shuffle.service.enabled set to
In Mesos coarse-grained mode, run
$SPARK_HOME/sbin/start-mesos-shuffle-service.sh on all
worker nodes with
spark.shuffle.service.enabled set to
true. For instance, you may do so
In YARN mode, follow the instructions here.
All other relevant configurations are optional and under the
spark.shuffle.service.* namespaces. For more detail, see the
Resource Allocation Policy
At a high level, Spark should relinquish executors when they are no longer used and acquire executors when they are needed. Since there is no definitive way to predict whether an executor that is about to be removed will run a task in the near future, or whether a new executor that is about to be added will actually be idle, we need a set of heuristics to determine when to remove and request executors.
A Spark application with dynamic allocation enabled requests additional executors when it has pending tasks waiting to be scheduled. This condition necessarily implies that the existing set of executors is insufficient to simultaneously saturate all tasks that have been submitted but not yet finished.
Spark requests executors in rounds. The actual request is triggered when there have been pending
spark.dynamicAllocation.schedulerBacklogTimeout seconds, and then triggered again
spark.dynamicAllocation.sustainedSchedulerBacklogTimeout seconds thereafter if the queue
of pending tasks persists. Additionally, the number of executors requested in each round increases
exponentially from the previous round. For instance, an application will add 1 executor in the
first round, and then 2, 4, 8 and so on executors in the subsequent rounds.
The motivation for an exponential increase policy is twofold. First, an application should request executors cautiously in the beginning in case it turns out that only a few additional executors is sufficient. This echoes the justification for TCP slow start. Second, the application should be able to ramp up its resource usage in a timely manner in case it turns out that many executors are actually needed.
The policy for removing executors is much simpler. A Spark application removes an executor when
it has been idle for more than
spark.dynamicAllocation.executorIdleTimeout seconds. Note that,
under most circumstances, this condition is mutually exclusive with the request condition, in that
an executor should not be idle if there are still pending tasks to be scheduled.
Graceful Decommission of Executors
Before dynamic allocation, if a Spark executor exits when the associated application has also exited then all state associated with the executor is no longer needed and can be safely discarded. With dynamic allocation, however, the application is still running when an executor is explicitly removed. If the application attempts to access state stored in or written by the executor, it will have to perform a recompute the state. Thus, Spark needs a mechanism to decommission an executor gracefully by preserving its state before removing it.
This requirement is especially important for shuffles. During a shuffle, the Spark executor first writes its own map outputs locally to disk, and then acts as the server for those files when other executors attempt to fetch them. In the event of stragglers, which are tasks that run for much longer than their peers, dynamic allocation may remove an executor before the shuffle completes, in which case the shuffle files written by that executor must be recomputed unnecessarily.
The solution for preserving shuffle files is to use an external shuffle service, also introduced in Spark 1.2. This service refers to a long-running process that runs on each node of your cluster independently of your Spark applications and their executors. If the service is enabled, Spark executors will fetch shuffle files from the service instead of from each other. This means any shuffle state written by an executor may continue to be served beyond the executor’s lifetime.
In addition to writing shuffle files, executors also cache data either on disk or in memory.
When an executor is removed, however, all cached data will no longer be accessible. To mitigate this,
by default executors containing cached data are never removed. You can configure this behavior with
spark.dynamicAllocation.cachedExecutorIdleTimeout. In future releases, the cached data may be
preserved through an off-heap storage similar in spirit to how shuffle files are preserved through
the external shuffle service.
Scheduling Within an Application
Inside a given Spark application (SparkContext instance), multiple parallel jobs can run simultaneously if
they were submitted from separate threads. By “job”, in this section, we mean a Spark action (e.g.
collect) and any tasks that need to run to evaluate that action. Spark’s scheduler is fully thread-safe
and supports this use case to enable applications that serve multiple requests (e.g. queries for
By default, Spark’s scheduler runs jobs in FIFO fashion. Each job is divided into “stages” (e.g. map and reduce phases), and the first job gets priority on all available resources while its stages have tasks to launch, then the second job gets priority, etc. If the jobs at the head of the queue don’t need to use the whole cluster, later jobs can start to run right away, but if the jobs at the head of the queue are large, then later jobs may be delayed significantly.
Starting in Spark 0.8, it is also possible to configure fair sharing between jobs. Under fair sharing, Spark assigns tasks between jobs in a “round robin” fashion, so that all jobs get a roughly equal share of cluster resources. This means that short jobs submitted while a long job is running can start receiving resources right away and still get good response times, without waiting for the long job to finish. This mode is best for multi-user settings.
To enable the fair scheduler, simply set the
spark.scheduler.mode property to
FAIR when configuring
Fair Scheduler Pools
The fair scheduler also supports grouping jobs into pools, and setting different scheduling options (e.g. weight) for each pool. This can be useful to create a “high-priority” pool for more important jobs, for example, or to group the jobs of each user together and give users equal shares regardless of how many concurrent jobs they have instead of giving jobs equal shares. This approach is modeled after the Hadoop Fair Scheduler.
Without any intervention, newly submitted jobs go into a default pool, but jobs’ pools can be set by
spark.scheduler.pool “local property” to the SparkContext in the thread that’s submitting them.
This is done as follows:
After setting this local property, all jobs submitted within this thread (by calls in this thread
collect, etc) will use this pool name. The setting is per-thread to make
it easy to have a thread run multiple jobs on behalf of the same user. If you’d like to clear the
pool that a thread is associated with, simply call:
Default Behavior of Pools
By default, each pool gets an equal share of the cluster (also equal in share to each job in the default pool), but inside each pool, jobs run in FIFO order. For example, if you create one pool per user, this means that each user will get an equal share of the cluster, and that each user’s queries will run in order instead of later queries taking resources from that user’s earlier ones.
Configuring Pool Properties
Specific pools’ properties can also be modified through a configuration file. Each pool supports three properties:
schedulingMode: This can be FIFO or FAIR, to control whether jobs within the pool queue up behind each other (the default) or share the pool’s resources fairly.
weight: This controls the pool’s share of the cluster relative to other pools. By default, all pools have a weight of 1. If you give a specific pool a weight of 2, for example, it will get 2x more resources as other active pools. Setting a high weight such as 1000 also makes it possible to implement priority between pools—in essence, the weight-1000 pool will always get to launch tasks first whenever it has jobs active.
minShare: Apart from an overall weight, each pool can be given a minimum shares (as a number of CPU cores) that the administrator would like it to have. The fair scheduler always attempts to meet all active pools’ minimum shares before redistributing extra resources according to the weights. The
minShareproperty can, therefore, be another way to ensure that a pool can always get up to a certain number of resources (e.g. 10 cores) quickly without giving it a high priority for the rest of the cluster. By default, each pool’s
The pool properties can be set by creating an XML file, similar to
and either putting a file named
fairscheduler.xml on the classpath, or setting
spark.scheduler.allocation.file property in your
SparkConf. The file path respects the hadoop configuration and can either be a local file path or HDFS file path.
The format of the XML file is simply a
<pool> element for each pool, with different elements
within it for the various settings. For example:
A full example is also available in
conf/fairscheduler.xml.template. Note that any pools not
configured in the XML file will simply get default values for all settings (scheduling mode FIFO,
weight 1, and minShare 0).
Scheduling using JDBC Connections
To set a Fair Scheduler pool for a JDBC client session,
users can set the
Concurrent Jobs in PySpark
PySpark, by default, does not support to synchronize PVM threads with JVM threads and
launching multiple jobs in multiple PVM threads does not guarantee to launch each job
in each corresponding JVM thread. Due to this limitation, it is unable to set a different job group
sc.setJobGroup in a separate PVM thread, which also disallows to cancel the job via
pyspark.InheritableThread is recommended to use together for a PVM thread to inherit the inheritable attributes
such as local properties in a JVM thread, and to avoid resource leak.